Outdoor flash photography | Part III

Outdoor flash photography | Part III



My secret to making clients feel more confident in their portrait!

The 85mm is a forgiving, flattering lens for portraits. 😇 But switch to a 35mm, and suddenly, body parts closest to the camera appear larger and exaggerated. 😲

This trick can either hide or accentuate specific features – the power is in your hands! 💪

Want to see these lens techniques in action? Watch my Off-Camera Flash webinar where I demonstrate how different lenses affect lighting and composition: 📸

GEAR USED:
Canon EL-100 Flash:
Canon EOS M50 Mark II Mirrorless Camera:
Canon EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM Lens:
Canon EF-M 22mm f/2:
V-FLAT WORLD Foldable V-Flat:
Canon R5:
Canon RF 28-70mm 2.0 L:
Profoto A1X:

#Photography #PortraitPhotography #PhotographyTips #LearnPhotography #PhotoOfTheDay #PhotographerLife #BehindTheLens

Comments

20 responses to “Outdoor flash photography | Part III”

  1. @argentum3919 Avatar
    @argentum3919

    Thanks. That was very interesting information. However, to be honest, other than the background, I can't tell the difference. The perspective is different because it seems you're
    closer to her in the 35 mm.

  2. @allencruise6299 Avatar
    @allencruise6299

    That's why most 85mm are default lenses for portrait photographers.

  3. @michaelkemp6857 Avatar
    @michaelkemp6857

    Better off with Nikon!!

  4. @gregorylagrange Avatar
    @gregorylagrange

    nothing new revealed about wide angel distortion.

  5. @rommeltvaccount4403 Avatar
    @rommeltvaccount4403

    She looks like Snapchick 🙂

  6. @film_insider Avatar
    @film_insider

    hahaha wtf is this lens. it can be used as artillery if it breaks 🙂

  7. @christianpetersen1782 Avatar
    @christianpetersen1782

    The 35 has elongated the model’s arm, and head 😮. It may be fine if you like that look or don’t have another photo or the real model to compare it with. The 35 shows the environment whereas the 85 is all about the model. Horses for courses.

  8. @suitabledjs Avatar
    @suitabledjs

    That is a serious lens with a serious price 😮 85mm

  9. @randyjaquez7269 Avatar
    @randyjaquez7269

    I hate how fat those lenses are

  10. @shiftintosunshine Avatar
    @shiftintosunshine

    ahhhh, thank you for this! great side by side!

  11. @HendrixKid17 Avatar
    @HendrixKid17

    I use a 24-70, but I actually like the 85 look. Is there a way to achieve it with the 24-70 lens?

  12. @MartinV. Avatar
    @MartinV.

    Great Video!!

  13. @arupian666 Avatar
    @arupian666

    I love you, Vanessa

  14. @richardewlliams9864 Avatar
    @richardewlliams9864

    The big difference is…background. GRINS

  15. @adrieltzu3565 Avatar
    @adrieltzu3565

    Can't make up my mind who's prettier the model or the photographer.

  16. @Sutterjack Avatar
    @Sutterjack

    I know it's all subjective, but I find the 85 is still not long enough for proper perspective in portraits. Yes you can get amazing bokeh with the fast 85, but I personally prefer my 100 2.8 macro for portraits (Canon shooter)

  17. @tommysk7901 Avatar
    @tommysk7901

    Beautiful 🤩❤️

  18. @christophewagner4028 Avatar
    @christophewagner4028

    TY 85 1.2 is pure magic

  19. @alejandroortiz4565 Avatar
    @alejandroortiz4565

    Thanks it works i vídeo too thanks You 😊

  20. @locsbcn Avatar
    @locsbcn

    28-70 ! Not 24-70 😙 happy new year !